The Troubles (1969-1998)

The Troubles

1969

British troops go to Ireland

1971

First British solider shot dead (by IRA)

1972

  • 497 died
  • ‘Bloody Sunday’ – British troops shot 13 civilians dead
  • ‘Bloody Friday’ – IRA bombings killing 9 people and injuring 130

1974

IRA expand bombings to the British mainland

1976

IRA car bomb attack: British ambassador in Dublin

1979

  • IRA car bomb attack: confidant of British prime minister Margaret Thatcher when leaving Downing Street
  • IRA boat bomb attack: Queen Elizabeth’s cousin

1985

Anglo-Irish agreement signed

1987

IRA bomb attack: 11 civilians killed (on Remembrance Day)

1990

IRA car bomb attack: conservative MP

1993

Downing Street declare the people of Northern Ireland can decide their own future

1994

Peace process becomes stronger

1996

Peace Talks are held off and Canary Wharf bombings happen

1997 

Peace talks are resumed and the final British solider is killed (until 2009 after the Troubles)

April 1998

The Good Friday Agreement is signed – end of the Troubles

August 1998

REAL IRA car bombing: Omagh – 29 people killed

 

After the Troubles

2009

Republic preliminaries shot dead 2 soldiers and wounded 4

 

2015

William and Katherine visit Ireland, five men arrested for possessing bomb-making equipment nearby.

‘Oysters’ – Seamus Heaney

In the poem ‘Oysters’, Heaney explores the greed that can come from the delicious oysters he ate once while having a meal with some friends that he describes as the ‘perfect memory’

The metaphor of his tongue being a ‘filling estuary’ creates the idea that these oysters are delicious and that he is enjoying them a lot. This is also shown through words such as ‘starlight’ which introduces an other worldly idea to the taste of these oysters which Heaney further explores by describing the taste as that of the food as being ‘salty Pleiades’ and by also mentioning ‘Orion’ – a giant hunter from Greek mythology, but also of the star constellation. This suggests an enjoyment that Heaney appreciates beyond mere taste and suggesting a hint of greatness of godliness within it.

There are suggestions from the diction Heaney changes to in the second stanza that there is an element of wrong in his enjoyment. Words such as ‘violated’, ‘split’ and ‘ripped’ suggest an inhumanity to the way that ‘millions’ of oysters are harvested from the sea. There is somewhat of a judgement on Heaney’s part about the ‘millions’ of oysters that are consumed. The repetition of the conjunction ‘and’ in this final line after the beginning of a new sentence with the first word being ‘millions’ further emphasises Heaney’s displeasure with the treatment and suggested inhumanity.

Heaney then goes on to criticise the greed of mankind. He himself finds great enjoyment, it seems, in the first stanza when he eats one, but he is critical of the Romans who ‘hauled’ the oysters they claimed as ‘their’ own. This is perhaps a reference to the greed of the Romans (and therefore also presumably the English) who claimed any land they found as their own, with no regard for the value of it to others. The oysters are special to Heaney (and, symbolically through him, the Irish) and so the violation of the Romans who greedily claim the oysters as ‘their’ own is somewhat of an outrage to him as they change the importance of the oyster from a personal one to one of fashion and ‘privilege’. Heaney seems to believe that people with wealth and prosperity will take whatever they like, particularly the Romans as that is exactly what they did, taking what they pleased back to Rome with them to become a fashionable luxury in high society.

‘Pleiades’ in Celtic mythology: associated with remembering the dead and therefore with (salty) tears and mourning.

Orion and the ‘Seven Sisters’: Orion fell in love with Pleione and her daughters and followed them for a long time in an attempt to win their affections. Zeus (supreme leader of the Gods) eventually helped the sisters by transforming them into doves in order to escape Orion.

How do Sheers and Heaney use memories of people?

Throughout the collections of ‘Field Work’ (Seamus Heaney) and ‘Skirrid Hill’ (Owen Sheers), each poet explores many memories of people. The encounters are all significant to the poets in different ways now that they have looked back on them. They have learned a lesson from each of the people in their poems that they carry in their memories and have grown from.

‘On Going’ is Sheers’ final memory of his deceased grandmother. Throughout, his diction creates the image of a breakable, old woman. The use of words such as ‘fragile’ and, ironically, ‘child’ presents the idea that she is helpless and innocent from what it is that is killing her be it age or a disease. The oxymoron ‘ancient child’ further emphasises this idea and enhances Sheers’ depiction of the fragile woman. However, Sheers also presents her in the first stanza as being a strong woman still in mindset when he reveals that she is ‘disconnected’ from the machines that wait beside her, ready to prolong her death. Most people in his grandmother’s position would use the machine but she becomes the machine as she is the only thing keeping her going.

The strength of the elderly is also looked at in Heaney’s poem ‘A Drink of Water’ – a poem in which Heaney describes a ‘bat’-like woman who is clearly ageing as is the place around her. The pump is personified throughout and becomes the elderly woman who will presumably have spent every day of her life using it. They have the same ‘whooping cough’ and the simile of her voice being like the creaking sound of the ‘pump’s handle’ also emphasises the similarities between the woman and the pump now that they are old and decrepit. Eventually, she becomes the water pump – the thing that keeps the people around alive just as Sheers’ grandmother becomes the life support machines. Both of the women seem to have the same sort of spirit towards their lives, hanging on and doing things for themselves. In ‘A Drink of Water’, the woman gets her own water (symbolic of life) and in ‘On Going’, the grandmother is simply trying to live by breathing on her own. Each poet explores two different lives that have ended up in similar ways where they are barely able to do the two simple tasks required to live.

As in ‘On Going’ and ‘A Drink of Water’, the poem ‘Casualty’ by Heaney presents the idea that death is inevitable. However, ‘Casualty’ presents the death of Louis O’Neill as a tragic one as it is not of old age but the result Louis O’Neill doing the same thing he did every day of his life – going for a drink. There is a difference between the life of Louis O’Neill and the old woman in ‘A Drink of Water’ in that her water is a life-preserver and his is essentially a life-destroyer’ in that it is what lead to his death. The metaphor of O’Neill being a fish that ‘naturally’ swam towards the ‘lure’ of pubs creates somewhat of an inevitability for the man’s death as it is a natural and seemingly unstoppable thing to stop the fish from seeking the reward it will get for being sucked in by the ‘lure’ going to the pub. In ‘Casualty’, Heaney makes it clear that O’Neill had a limited number of passions in his life, fishing being among them. It is fitting, then, that rather than going to his funeral, Heaney remembers back to when he went out of a boat with his hand, which allowed him to be more spiritually connected with his friend more than a funeral would have. This suggests an importance to Heaney towards the relationship between a person and their passions as is also suggested by Sheers in ‘The Farrier’ and ‘The Equation’ where a deep connection between man and nature is described.

‘The Farrier’ depicts a relationship that is much more connected than that of Louis O’Neill and fish (perhaps it is as connected as O’Neill and his drink are). Whereas Sheers suggests that the farrier’s life is being his job, O’Neill has no job and seems to live in a state of poverty. There is a suggestion of suffering on Heaney’s part as he remembers how O’Neill’s life was. He was a man born to work (as the farrier was) and he was a man fully skilled to working, but because of the political state of the country he live in, he wasn’t able to. He is a man with few passions – only fish, the land that he lived in (‘horses and cart’) and the ‘Provisionals’. Heaney suggests that he was ready to die for the IRA – for the land he was passionate about – and yet he died for his other passion.

Finally, in both ‘Casualty’ and Sheers’ ‘Mametz Wood’, there are ideas of conflict and suffering. Heaney presents the deaths very factually but the use of shorter lines creates a sadness for the losses of the men and by leaving the first section with this information and the people shocked and grieving as they ‘held [their] breath and trembled’, we are given a pause to reflect and digest the sadness of their deaths. Sheers is looking back at an event that happened much before his time and so the memory of the soldiers is not as much of a personal one for him as Heaney’s would have been, growing up around it. However, Sheers also manages to present the sadness that is to be felt and the question of “was there any point – is it all really worth the death of men?” that Heaney seems to suggest from the shock. The shock of the Irish will have been a reality check – the truth that only comes after realising that war means death.

 

Which interpretation of the impact of ‘A Drink of Water’ do you prefer?

I prefer Carolyn Meyer’s criticism of ‘A Drink of Water’ because I agree more with points that she made on the symbolism of the pump being a ‘symbol and touchstone’ within his life (particularly his earlier life) rather than the idea Kushner argues which is that Heaney is using the sonnet as a way to ‘write in the poetic form of his enemy’. In the poem, Heaney is remembering a childhood memory and it seems that adulthood and maturity has allowed him to realise the significance of the well in the way it was able to physically and spiritually replenish the five households it did.

This criticism also highlights the fact that ‘Field Work’ was Heaney’s ‘return to traditional verse forms’ after he had attempted to write in different ways. This could help to explain why he chose to use the Shakespearian sonnet rhyming form (ababcdcdefefgg) and the Petrarchan model of there being a question at the beginning, followed by an ease of doubt, a satisfaction of the desire and finally a fulfilled vision. Heaney is a contemporary poet which could explain his renovation to any of the more traditional sonnet styles.

Meyer also talks about the comments of feminist critic Rachel Blau Du Plessis on the sonnet being written about “voiceless, beautiful females in object position”. This contrasts Heaney’s use of it in ‘A Drink of Water’ as she is still a voiceless woman but her life is shown through the mundane task that Heaney describes her doing and she is therefore given something of a personality. The sonnet isn’t used by Heaney in the way it is traditionally used – the way that Blau Du Plessis describes – instead, the use of the sonnet suggests that Heaney has a simple admiration for the old woman’s faithfulness towards her life. Meyer speaks of this when she says that ‘A Drink of Water’ widens the scope of the sonnet to allow Heaney to ‘express a love of this world and the possibilities as sustained by acts of fortitude and faithfulness’.

A Welsh Landscape (R.S. Thomas – poem)

thecuriousastronomer

My favourite Anglo-Welsh poet (a Welsh poet writing in English) is R.S. Thomas. The first poem of his that I came across was when I was 13. In our school English class we read “Cynddylan on his tractor”. It made me angry when I read it. Thomas seemed to be belittling the Welsh. It took me several poems and several weeks to realise that he was attempting to awaken Welsh people’s apathy towards their country.

20130220-110459.jpg

Thomas was born in Cardiff to English speaking parents. He went to Bangor University, where he read classics. He then went into the ministry, being ordained as a priest in the Church of Wales. Thomas learnt Welsh when he was 30, but he never wrote poetry in Welsh as he felt it was not his native tongue and so he didn’t feel his Welsh was good enough. Despite learning Welsh in adulthood, Thomas…

View original post 297 more words

‘Skirrid Fawr’ – Owen Sheers

Skirrid Fawr.jpg

‘Shirrid Fawr’ is a classic example of a Sheers poem. It contains themes of farming and agriculture, admiration for landscape, comparisons to (female) body parts and a strong appreciation for languages and writing. He talks about the importance it has to the land and beliefs that come with it – the religious beliefs that part of the hill broke off at the moment Jesus was crucified. His admiration for the land is shown by the fact he refers to the hill as a ‘her’ which suggests adoration because of what we have learned about Sheers throughout the collection. We know that he loves the place because it is where he goes when he needs ‘answers’ and he refers to ‘her’ ground as being ‘holy’. The hill is then refered to as having a ‘back’, a ‘spine’, a ‘palate’ and ‘flanks’ – words he has used to describe both females and female animals throughout the collection. Finally, describes the walk up as a ‘sentence’  and talks about ‘vernaculars’, ‘words’ and the ‘tongue.

‘L.A. Evening’ – Owen Sheers

“I shall give you hunger and pain and sleepless nights, also beauty and satisfaction known to few, and glimpses of the heavenly life. None of these shall you have continually, and of their coming and going you shall not be foretold.”

‘L.A. Evening’ is about the glimpses that an artist has in their profession and how they can suffer from it. The poem follows an old actress who was swept up in the life of her profession when it had been good. She is remembering in the poem how the life was and how deceived she was by the whole facade. She believed her friends were real ones when really they were faking it and using her for their own selfish gains. At the end of it all, all she has are her animals who come and go as it suits them – the dogs in the night and the cats in the day – and the only camera that follows her now is her security camera, because that is all that’s left from her former life as a star.

‘The Fishmonger’ – Owen Sheers

‘The Fishmonger’ is another example a poem in which Sheers shows his admiration for the skill of people in their professions – especially when their profession is working with nature. He presents the fishmonger almost as an artist in the way the he skilfully handles and kills the fish. Sheers says that the fishmonger understands ‘as only he can’ which presents the level of expertise Sheers feels the monger has and emphasises his admiration for his craft and skill.

The poem is also a remake of an older Hungarian poem called Halarus. Sheers has taken the poem and made it into his own by relating it to his own experiences and his own culture.

A translated version of ‘Halarus’ by Istvan Laszlo.

This is his day. On the crest of his hair,
like some military mock-up,
his cap lists; he weighs up the punters
by their quickest flickers, pulls out carp quick snap,
keeps his in-growing fingernail stinging
in fish water –
got to feel

the heads of the fish. The silvering eyes
only make sense to the man
with gut-knife in hand, in his gut his intent
to the cut; the man who does what he does
for us all, who does what he must, what is meant;
who knows the points at ankle, wrist,
to best hammer a nail in; who can fillet
a man easy as you’d ease open
one of these fish; who cuts the chat
to let his blade do the talking; tidy; fights when he hurts.
There’s no bark around his heart. I mean, picture a tree
nailed by lightning, the hanging flesh of it aflame.
No, I meant
the fish aflame in his hands, its last supper, its mouthing
for water in the air.

‘History’ – Owen Sheers

In this poem, Sheers is saying that in order to fully understand Wales’ history, we have to immerse ourselves in the landscape and not be passive about it. Welsh history, to Sheers, is in the landscape because of the amount of quarries and other places that are importance in terms of a typical Welshman’s heritage and ancestry. The people of Wales take the importance of their history very seriously and so throughout the poem, Sheers tries to convey this belief.

The quarry is described as being ‘disguised’ in the shortest line of the poem. The use of this word creates the suggestion that a quarry is something that has been hidden to be kept a secret because it is private and personal to the Welsh. This is because quarrying is such a big part of the Welsh history and because the people of Wales want it to remain reserved and special.

The bird’s song echoing in the quarry is an echo of the drilling that used to happen there – Wales’ history. This metaphor is used by Sheers to echo the country’s history using nature. This is typical of Sheers because he often uses nature to represent things in mankind.

The idea of the preciousness of the country’s history is continues when Sheers says you can ‘tap’ the ground with a shovel to open it. While this literally means that you should dig into the land to find Wales’ history, it also creates the idea that the ground contains precious things such as when you tap a tree to get the sap out. The history of Wales would come out as the sap would until you have the precious history of the precious country.

The slate of the quarry becomes a metaphor for a history book which again emphasises the importance of the quarrying industry in Wales – specifically slate quarrying which would have been the main job a person would have had in the area around Crimea Pass that Sheers is writing about. Sheers also creates the image of the history literally being written on the valley as he suggests that you can actually see it as well as saying in the final couplet that it is written across everybody in the valley who hold onto their history.

As Sheers rarely uses rhymes, the full rhyme between ‘stone’ and ‘bone’ draws our attention. The link between these two words also links their ideas – that the ‘story of the stone’ is what is written in everyone’s bones. Ending the poem on this sums Sheers’ idea up. That the people of Wales value their history